Public Administration: Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge

Public Administration: Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge

Norma M. Riccucci

https://press.georgetown.edu/Book/Public-Administration

Source: Scribd

Public Administration: Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge (2010) explains how the field of public administration understands and produces knowledge. It begins with the long-standing question of whether the discipline is more like an art shaped by values or a science grounded in facts, showing that no single definition fully captures its nature. The book describes the intellectual roots of public administration, how its identity has shifted over time, and why debates about its methods and philosophy persist. It presents the logic of inquiry in the field by outlining different ways of knowing, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research. Each of these approaches is shown as a way to build theory and understand public administration phenomena, with different assumptions about reality and evidence. The text emphasizes the rich diversity of research traditions, encouraging readers to see this variety not as a problem but as a strength that reflects the complexity of public governance and policy. Throughout, understanding how different philosophical perspectives shape questions, methods, and interpretations deepens insight into both the practice and study of public administration.

So basically, buku Public Administration: Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge karya Norma M. Riccucci ini tuh like literally ngebahas gimana caranya public administration sebagai disiplin ilmu itu understand dan produce knowledge. Well... you knowwww, ada perdebatan klasik yang sampe sekarang masih ongoing: apakah public administration itu lebih ke art yang value-driven atau science yang fact-based? Ternyata gak ada definisi tunggal yang bisa fully capture nature-nya, which is totally fine!

Buku ini ngajak lo buat explore intellectual roots dari public administration, gimana identitasnya berubah over time, dan kenapa debat soal methods sama philosophy-nya masih terus berlanjut. Yang menarik tuh dia nge-break down berbagai logic of inquiry - mulai dari qualitative, quantitative, sampe mixed-method research. Each approach punya assumptions sendiri soal reality dan evidence, dan semua valid buat build theory dan understand phenomena di public administration. Exactly, that's the point - diversity itu bukan weakness, tapi justru strength yang reflects kompleksitas dari public governance dan policy.

At least, setidaknya lo jadi paham bahwa different philosophical perspectives itu literally shape gimana caranya lo formulate questions, choose methods, dan interpret findings. Gak make sense banget kalo lo cuma stuck di satu approach doang karena public administration itu super complex dan butuh multiple lenses buat beneran understand-nya. Gw sih lebih prefer kalo lo embrace this diversity instead of nyari satu "correct" way aja.

5 Mei 27 Mei 28 April 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 April 2023 Dokumen Dokumen Kinerja Dokumen Perencanaan Februari 2024 Februari 2025 Inspektorat Daerah Januari 2024 Kecamatan Kementerian Dalam Negeri Kinerja Laporan Hasil Evaluasi Laporan Hasil Evaluasi AKIP Laporan Hasil Evaluasi AKIP Tahun 2022 Laporan Hasil Evaluasi AKIP Tahun 2023 Laporan Hasil Evaluasi AKIP Tahun 2024 Maret 2025 Mei 2024 Mei 2025 Music Music Album Musrenbang Musrenbang Kecamatan Musrenbang RKPD Musrenbang RKPD Tahun 2025 Peraturan Bupati Pirate Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah RKPD Tahun 2025 RKPD Tahun 2026 RPJMD Tahun 2025-2029 SAKIP SAKIP Tahun 2024 Sekretariat Daerah Surat Edaran